The US budget for 2008 shows over 50% is spent on the military. |
US citizens need to be asking why it is that we take such good care of the military with our taxes and such minimal care of our citizens in need. We currently spend more than $50 billion a year on nuclear weapons and their delivery systems, weapons that cannot be used without destroying ourselves in the process. If we wanted to be serious about reducing the military budget, we could start with abandoning plans to modernize our nuclear arsenal for $80 billion over the next 10 years and improving delivery systems for nuclear weapons for $100 billion over 10 years. In fact, we should be asking ourselves in a serious way why we need nuclear weapons at all, and wouldn't we be far better off leading the way to a world without these weapons.
For roughly $50 billion annually we could assure that the United Nations meets its eight Millennium Development Goals by 2015 to reduce poverty, disease, childhood and maternal mortality, etc. We would have far less need for a bloated, oversized and largely ineffective military if we reached out to the world with anti-poverty measures rather than predator drones and wars of choice.
David, you're absolutely right about the necessity of re-balancing 'our' priorities.
ReplyDeleteOn this subject, and on how US Defense Secetary Robert Gates fits into this, I would like to refer to an article in the August 30th edition of Newsweek, entitled 'Be more like Ike' by the always excellent Fareed Zakaria.
Best, Rob